Discussion:
Fact is, AngloSaxons have ruled the world for the last 200 years and...
(too old to reply)
The Harbinger
2004-02-15 16:18:17 UTC
Permalink
the rest of the world, especially Islam, has a problem with that.

Aint that a shame?
Kiss My Asscroft
2004-02-15 17:01:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Harbinger
the rest of the world, especially Islam, has a problem with that.
Aint that a shame?
What they have a problem with is racist windbags like you and Bush who think
they are better just based on their religion and skin color.
--
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
~Will Rogers
The Harbinger
2004-02-16 00:15:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kiss My Asscroft
Post by The Harbinger
the rest of the world, especially Islam, has a problem with that.
Aint that a shame?
What they have a problem with is racist windbags like you and Bush who think
they are better just based on their religion and skin color.
What is the definition of a racist?
Someone that is winning an argument with a liberal.

Read the post again. It said AngloSaxons have ruled the world for the
last 200 years and the rest of the world, especially Islam, has a
problem with that.

Clearly you have a problem with it too. What does that make you?

It couldnt possibly make you a racist could it?

:)
Kiss My Asscroft
2004-02-16 01:56:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Harbinger
Clearly you have a problem with it too. What does that make you?
Another teflon repug. Try as you might, you can't twist your closet racism
around to implicate someone else.
--
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
~Will Rogers
The Harbinger
2004-02-16 20:30:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kiss My Asscroft
Post by The Harbinger
Clearly you have a problem with it too. What does that make you?
Another teflon repug. Try as you might, you can't twist your closet racism
around to implicate someone else.
Silly me... There i am, just proud of being Anglo Saxon and instead im
a racist!

I hate myself already...

Now.......

If i was black and i said that the anglo-saxons had ruled the world
for the last two centuries woud it be okay?
adrian
2004-02-16 20:20:39 UTC
Permalink
Christians don't worship a paedophile prophit or stone people for
adultry. Christianity has moved on - Islaam is stuck in the dark ages.
Why can't women drive cars in Saudi?
Kiss My Asscroft
2004-02-20 15:39:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by adrian
Christians don't worship a paedophile prophit or stone people for
adultry. Christianity has moved on - Islaam is stuck in the dark ages.
Why can't women drive cars in Saudi?
What about the Priests that are raping kids in the Baptist and Catholic
sects?
--
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
~Will Rogers
The Harbinger
2004-02-20 19:35:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kiss My Asscroft
Post by adrian
Christians don't worship a paedophile prophit or stone people for
adultry. Christianity has moved on - Islaam is stuck in the dark ages.
Why can't women drive cars in Saudi?
What about the Priests that are raping kids in the Baptist and Catholic
sects?
Yes but why cant women drive cars in Saudi?

As for Islam being stuck in the dark ages, thats an unfair falsehood.
Its nowhere near as progressive as that!

Its actually prehistoric!

from http://www.duhaime.org/Law_museum/hist.htm#2350bc

2350 BC: Urukagina's Code
This code has never been discovered but it is mentioned in other
documents as a consolidation of existing "ordinances" or laws laid
down by Mesopotamian kings. An administrative reform document was
discovered which showed that citizens were allowed to know why certain
actions were punished. It was also harsh by modern standards. Thieves
and adulteresses were to be stoned to death with stones inscribed with
the name of their crime.
Kiss My Asscroft
2004-02-20 22:12:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Harbinger
Post by Kiss My Asscroft
What about the Priests that are raping kids in the Baptist and Catholic
sects?
Yes but why cant women drive cars in Saudi?
As for Islam being stuck in the dark ages, thats an unfair falsehood.
Its nowhere near as progressive as that!
Its actually prehistoric!
from http://www.duhaime.org/Law_museum/hist.htm#2350bc
It really is nice to know that you are more concerned with a Saudi woman's
right to drive, than you are about children being raped by those they look up
to here in the USA.

Is that the repug ticket this election?
--
I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.
~Will Rogers
The Harbinger
2004-02-21 13:31:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kiss My Asscroft
Post by The Harbinger
Post by Kiss My Asscroft
What about the Priests that are raping kids in the Baptist and Catholic
sects?
Yes but why cant women drive cars in Saudi?
As for Islam being stuck in the dark ages, thats an unfair falsehood.
Its nowhere near as progressive as that!
Its actually prehistoric!
from http://www.duhaime.org/Law_museum/hist.htm#2350bc
It really is nice to know that you are more concerned with a Saudi woman's
right to drive, than you are about children being raped by those they look up
to here in the USA.
Is that the repug ticket this election?
When did i say i was more concerned about a Saudi woman's
right to drive, than i am about children being raped by those they
look up
to there in the USA?

You completely changed the subject thats why i restated the question.
Answer the question. Why cant women drive cars in Saudi?

The answer that you are so obviously desperate to avoid by making a
statement that has no relevance to Islam is that women are treated as
second class citizens or virtual slaves depending on their social
standing.

This is yet another example of pre-civilisation society.

Loading...